home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
CNN Newsroom: Global View
/
CNN Newsroom: Global View.iso
/
fsu
/
fsu.po2
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-06-28
|
57KB
|
1,092 lines
<text>
<title>Helsinki Watch: Soviet Union</title>
<article>
<hdr>
Human Rights Watch World Report 1992
Helsinki Watch: Soviet Union
</hdr>
<body>
<p>Human Rights Developments
</p>
<p> The year 1991 saw the destruction of the Soviet Union as a
political entity, a process that seemed to be culminating at
year's end. The strong pro-independence vote in the Ukrainian
referendum on December 1, following the failure of Soviet
President Gorbachev in his various efforts to create a new
political union, led to a meeting on December 8 involving
Russian President Boris Yeltsin, Belorussian Supreme Soviet
Chairman Stanislau Shushkevich, and Ukrainian President Leonid
Kravchuk at which they established a commonwealth of independent
states open to all republics of the former USSR.
</p>
<p> The new commonwealth will strive for coordination in foreign
policy, development of a common economic space, customs and
migration policies, transport and communications, ecology and
the struggle against crime. Although Soviet President Gorbachev
promptly declared this proclamation illegal, within days the
parliaments of the three Slavic republics had ratified the
commonwealth, and the four Central Asian republics plus
Kazakhstan said they wanted to join the commonwealth. At the
time of this writing, Yeltsin had announced that ten of the 12
remaining republics would join the commonwealth by the end of
the year, and that President Gorbachev had no place in the new
commonwealth structure.
</p>
<p> The three Slavic republics that launched the commonwealth,
as founding members of the Soviet Union and signatories of the
1922 state treaty, proclaimed the end of the USSR "as a subject
of international law and a geopolitical reality." Articles in
the commonwealth agreement proclaim that USSR laws are
henceforth invalid on their republic territory and that USSR
organs will cease their activities in these republics.
</p>
<p> The disappearance of the central government ministries--the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Procuracy, the Ministry
of Justice--will have a marked effect on human rights. The
rather extensive reforms of, for example, the Criminal Code, are
now left to the discretionary power of the republic governments.
The human rights picture will become as multi-faceted as the
newly powerful republics.
</p>
<p> The republics have confirmed their "commitment to the goals
and principles of the United Nations Charter, the Helsinki
Final Act and other documents from the Conference on Security
and Cooperation in Europe" and their obligation "to observe
common international norms on human and national rights."
</p>
<p> Several articles of the commonwealth declaration proclaim
specific human rights commitments. The major such proclamation
is in Article Two:
</p>
<p> "The agreeing parties guarantee their citizens, regardless
of nationality or other differences, equal rights and freedoms.
Each of the agreeing parties guarantees citizens of other
parties and also people without citizenship who reside on its
territory, regardless of nationality or other differences,
civil, political, social, economic and cultural rights and
freedoms in accordance with common international norms on human
rights."
</p>
<p> The human rights pledges in this article represent a welcome
beginning for the new commonwealth. Particularly key is the
promise of equal treatment under the law of all residents in
republic territories. It remains to be seen, however, how well
republic leaders will observe these pledges in practice.
</p>
<p> Many events treated in this chapter occurred before the
abortive coup of August 19, when the central government ruled--however ineffectually--over the Soviet Union. (For the sake
of consistency and simplicity, the terms "Soviet," "Soviet
Union" and "USSR" are used to refer to the region both before
and after the August coup. Since the December 8 Commonwealth
declaration, however, these terms have become part of history.)
</p>
<p> The year began on a dismal note for human rights policies
and practices in the Soviet Union. President Mikhail Gorbachev,
who had largely abandoned democratic reform in the fall of
1990, tried to curtail freedoms of press and assembly and
sanctioned a vicious crackdown in Lithuania and Latvia.
High-level official advocates of liberal reform either resigned
or were fired from the USSR government. The "war of laws"
between Moscow and the republics signaled the center's growing
ineffectiveness and the republics' determination to set their
own course.
</p>
<p> When Gorbachev returned to more democratic policies in the
spring of 1991, he focused on drafting a new union treaty and
securing Western aid for the desperate Soviet economy. On
August 19, the day before the union treaty was to be signed by
the participating republics, key right-wing members of the
Soviet government, all Gorbachev appointees, declared a state
of emergency and attempted to restore power to the center. Due
to its plotters' stunning incompetence, and the lack of support
for their move among key segments of the government, the coup
failed after three days.
</p>
<p> Had it succeeded, the coup could have totally changed the
human rights picture in the Soviet Union, almost surely for the
worse. Its failure, instead, ushered in political chaos,
leaving considerable uncertainty about the protection of human
rights. The collapse of the central government and the
discrediting of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU)
empowered republic leaders, unleashing intense power struggles
in some republics. In the post-coup period, it is feared that
internal social and economic tensions and popular anger at
undemocratic local leaders will more often find expression in
bitter--if not violent--confrontation than in the
painstaking, consensus-building work of democratic institutions.
Moreover, participants in some of these political struggles are
armed, an alarming development which imperils civilians and
bodes poorly for democratic outcomes.
</p>
<p> Nationalism has surged throughout the Soviet Union's myriad
ethnic groups, encouraging republic leaders to take up
nationalist agendas. In Georgia and Azerbaidzhan, for example,
intensified struggles for power are exacerbating already lethal
interethnic violence. No republic is ethnically homogenous. In
some republics including the Russian Republic (RSFSR), ethnic
minorities that have their own political-administrative units
are waging intense battles for autonomy. Minorities without
political representation fear discrimination. For example,
Russians in many of the non-Russian republics are leaving their
homes in response to an anti-Russian mood. It is no surprise,
therefore, that human rights violations increasingly involve the
rights of ethnic minorities.
</p>
<p> It is unclear who will win the political struggles and what
kinds of governments will take hold in the republics. This
turbulent political transition is particular cause for concern
as power devolves to the republics and they assume jurisdiction
over institutions with human rights mandates.
</p>
<p> In the wake of the attempted coup, the central government
avowed that respect for human rights was a priority in the
Soviet Union. In September, the Congress of People's Deputies
issued a Declaration of Human Rights and Freedoms. The document
provides for a wide range of civil and political rights. Marking
a clean break with socialism's emphasis on collective rights,
no mention was made of group interests in the definition of the
freedoms of speech, association, conscience, religion and
assembly. In addition to civil and political rights, the
Declaration sets out social and economic rights, including the
right to work, property, education, sufficient living standards,
and state support in housing and health protection.
</p>
<p> In September, the Soviet government moved toward a more
meaningful acceptance of international standards for human
rights. At the Moscow Conference on the Human Dimension, part
o